Thursday, July 26, 2007
The two main characters in the passages The Schooldays of an Indian Girl by Zitkala-Sa and Leaves from the Mental Portfolio of an Eurasian by Sui Sin Far definitely shared some similarities. Both narrators are not white and they share some of the same prejudices growing up. They're stared at, snickered at, and laughed at by many people which forces them to do a lot of thinking and wanting to know their origins. The stories differ in that the Native American narrator is born in her own people's culture and taken away by the "palefaces" while the Chinese narrator is born not knowing much about her heritage or native tongue and is on more of a mission to get as close to her roots as possible. I felt like the main character in the second passage was happier to be half Chinese and more expressive of her origin then the Native American character. The main character in the first passage seemed to have undergone more of a shock in her childhood though. She was taken from her home, placed on a train, and sent to a school where her culture was not accepted and where she was expected to undergo drastic changes. The character in the second passage seemed to also be expected to be defiant of her roots and consider herself anything besides Chinese which she didn't do. Both characters seemed really strong to me because they both stood up and faced the prejudices being thrown in their faces and pretty much stood up for their race by continuing what they wanted to be doing and not pretending to be anything else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I liked your point about the differences. I felt the same, that the Indian girl was steadfastly trying to hold onto her culture while it was being stripped away from her, and the Chinese girl was desperately trying to learn about her culture. I thought the way they defended their cultures (the Indian girl by educating others about her world through education and speech; the Chinese girl by defending her race to those who insulted it) were different, but both equally brilliant.
I agree. Although, they handled the situations differently I believe that each way worked to defend their culture. However, I do feel like educating people about something that they dont understand is the best way to apporach situations such as this one. Yet, being that I have never been put in this situation, I dont think i fully understand what it would be like to be placed in that situation.
I agree with all three of you! I definitely feel like both girls sought to defend their backgrounds, but I feel as if the girl of Chinese heritage fought a little more actively. I think that their environments had a lot to do with how they handled the issue, and I feel like the Native girl would have probably been more active if she had not been exposed to ethnocentrism so early in her life. I think that because she was so young, she was more subject to mental molding by her instructors at school. Although I do agree with you both, though, I do feel like it is the opportunity of the ill-informed to seek knowledge and to increase their understanding of things they are not familiar with. Learning comes through exploration, and knowledge never simply falls into anyone's lap. I think people who are oppressed need allies, and that those allies should not only meet the oppressed halfway, but they should totally help increase awareness.
Oh, sorry, one more thing! I know this is long, but I don't think that the Native girl's winning of her speech competition was a conscious effort to raise awareness, but I definitely think that it showed people that people from similar backgrounds are just as able as anyone else.
Post a Comment